MLOps architecture
MLOps architecture audit for claims
A structured review of how models move from experiment to production in your claims stack.
- Duration
- 6 weeks
- Format
- Intensive interviews + readout workshop
- Indicative fee
- ₩19,800,000
Overview
We interview teams, read architecture diagrams, and inspect CI/CD realities—not slide decks. The output is a risk-ranked backlog covering reproducibility, access control, secrets handling, and incident response.
What is included
- Artifact lineage expectations for claims models
- Secrets and key rotation review for inference endpoints
- Access matrix for data scientists vs platform engineers
- Disaster recovery gaps for batch scoring windows
- Alignment map to ISO-style controls where applicable
- Roadmap slices sized for 30/60/90-day execution
- Plain-language board briefing
Outcomes you can inspect
- Single prioritized remediation list
- Shared vocabulary between risk and platform teams
- Clear owner per gap, even when the owner is you
Rina Cho
MLOps engineer with a background in regulated batch pipelines for large carriers.
FAQ
No. It is an advisory audit. Your internal audit function remains accountable for formal assurance.
Read-only access accelerates accuracy but is not mandatory if strong documentation exists.
We do not perform source code line-by-line security review of vendor black boxes beyond interface contracts.
Experience notes
“Blunt without being theatrical. Some items were obvious technically but politically stuck; they separated those from pure engineering debt.”
“Liked the access matrix—finally something compliance could annotate without a six-week translation project.”